Skip to main content

Posts

Week 10

Social Semiotics: A Visual Approach to Meaning Making Social semiotics is all about understanding how visuals communicate meaning. Instead of just focusing on words, this approach looks at how images, gestures, and even the way things are arranged in a picture influence what we take away from it. The idea comes from Michael Halliday, who developed systemic functional linguistics, and was later expanded by Gunther Kress, who applied it to visual communication. In today’s media-heavy world, social semiotics helps us make sense of advertising, photography, and design, giving us a better grasp of how visuals shape our thoughts and emotions. Key Principles of Social Semiotics To break down images, social semiotics uses a few principles focusing on positioning, composition, and color choices. These elements help guide how we interpret images and visual message. 1. Vertical Positioning Top of the image: Represents ideals, aspirations, or abstract concepts. Bottom of the image: Represents real...
Post a Comment
Read more
Recent posts

Week 9 - The Digital Battleground

The Digital Battleground: Social Media and Public Opinion Social media has fundamentally transformed how public opinion forms today. What once required access to traditional gatekeepers now operates in a dynamic ecosystem where influence can emerge from virtually anywhere. The democratization of voice means nearly anyone can reach millions, creating both remarkable opportunities and significant challenges. As Leftheriotis and Giannakos noted in their 2014 research, these platforms function as spaces where information exchange happens continuously without traditional controls. The speed of opinion formation has accelerated dramatically. Where public discourse once evolved over days through editorial pages, social media operates in real-time. A trending hashtag can emerge, dominate conversation, and fade within hours. What's particularly concerning is how algorithms reinforce existing beliefs. Platforms designed to maximize engagement often show users content that confirms their ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 9

Communication Fallacies: How Politicians Manipulate Logic In Ed Rogers' Washington Post opinion piece "Democrats' frightening embrace of socialism" , I discovered several textbook communication fallacies that undermine his argument.  Slippery Slope Fallacy Rogers claims a guaranteed monthly stipend would inevitably lead to ever-increasing payments in each election cycle: "A guaranteed monthly stipend would become the floor. And every subsequent election would be a referendum on whether voters want to support the candidate promising the larger pay raise from Washington." Our lecture explains this fallacy assumes "once a course of action is taken, other unavoidable events will inevitably occur" - but we can't actually predict the future with such certainty. Either/Or Fallacy (False Dilemma) Rogers presents an overly simplified choice: "It certainly means every Democrat running for president in 2020 will be asked if they favor social...
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 7

The Rhetoric of Online Arguments: A Case Study of "The Dress" Why I Chose "The Dress" Online Argument I selected the online debate surrounding "The Dress" for this assignment because it offers a compelling example of how a seemingly trivial topic can escalate into a viral phenomenon, This argument from 2015 not only highlighted differences in human color perception but also showcased the rhetorical strategies employed by participants in online arguments. We can examine the ways people argued about the dress's colors and learn insights into the strengths and weaknesses of online communication. Negative Examples and Concerns Polarization and Lack of Empathy : The online debate often became polarized, with people failing to acknowledge or understand opposing viewpoints. This lack of empathy hindered constructive dialogue and led to a breakdown in respectful communication. Misinformation and Speculation : The spread of misinformation and speculative theori...
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 5

I've always enjoyed NPR's All Things Considered , and I want to share this incredible segment I heard about coastal communities and climate change. I chose this piece because of how well it shows what we read about making connections through conversation (Griffin et al., 2023, p. 111). Host Mary Louise Kelly has this amazing way of walking us through tough topics - when locals share stories about losing their homes to rising waters, she knows just when to pause, letting their words really hit home. It's like she's leading a careful conversation between facts and feelings. The story feels made for listeners who want to understand both the science and the human side of things. Kelly does what Berger calls "managing complex plans" really well (Griffin et al., 2023, p. 110) - she moves smoothly between explaining climate science and sharing personal stories. What really stood out was how Kelly used timing and tone. There's this powerful moment where someone de...
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 4

The Immigrant/Native Divide  In 2001, he identified what appeared to be a clear pattern: young people were naturally adapting to new technology while older generations struggled. He framed it in terms we still hear today - "digital natives" vs "digital immigrants." The data tells a different story. Recent research, particularly from Kirschner and De Bruyckere, plus a comprehensive ECDL study , effectively dismantles this framework. Being born after 1984 doesn't automatically make someone tech-savvy - the relationship between age and digital competence is far more nuanced. What's concerning is how this misconception impacts organizations. We're seeing older workers dismissed as technologically incompetent while younger staff get pigeonholed as technical support rather than leadership material. The research shows that executives who understand technology the least tend to lean hardest into this "digital native" narrative. The business impact is s...
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 3

Rebuilding Family Relationships It's interesting how relationships shift over time. I've been thinking about my relationship with my parents lately, especially through the lens of Knapp's Relational Model. From close childhood bonds to rough patches and finally finding stable (in an agree-to-disagree-but-move-on kind of way) ground as adults, we've basically hit every stage of the model. I'm sharing this from a much better place now than I've been with it in the past, but that's growth, right? The Early Years Things started great - I was that kid who did everything "right." Straight A's, active in our religious community, the works. My parents were my biggest cheerleaders back then. Looking at Knapp's model, we were definitely in the Bonding Stage - lots of trust and understanding all around. Then came college. Dating someone they didn't approve of opened my eyes to some contradictions in their beliefs and actions that I hadn't noti...
Post a Comment
Read more