Skip to main content

Week 2

Week 2

Using Different Social Networking Sites Differently

Do different social networking sites offer other benefits and drawbacks? 

Different social networks absolutely serve unique purposes in my life, with some surprisingly meaningful impacts. LinkedIn has been far more than just a digital resume - it's actually how I discovered and landed my last two jobs. Those "weak ties" the chapter mentions became incredibly valuable when former colleagues shared opportunities that ended up being perfect fits. I never would have known about them otherwise.

Facebook acts as my connection hub with long-time friends and family. Just this week, I learned about a cousin's engagement before I ever received a text about it. Instagram is different for me - I tend to follow a wider range of people (or I did when I still used it actively). It became a source of doom scrolling, especially as my feed became cluttered with ads or accounts used for hawking affiliate marketing products.

What I find most interesting is how my usage naturally evolved - I'm much more intentional now about which platforms I use for what purposes. Like the chapter mentions about multimodality, I've learned to match the platform to the type of connection or communication I'm after, rather than trying to be active everywhere.

Less Weak Ties = More Mental Clarity?

Is there an ideal number of "friends" or connections individuals have on Facebook that can improve their mental health? 

I use Facebook for those long-term connections with family and friends, or groups that I might need (my kids' sport teams, PTA), or want (social groups like whale watchers, volunteering opportunities). The number of true people connections are narrowed to people I'd stop and talk to in real life. It's never dawned on me to check my number of connections, so that metric is very unmeaningful to me.

I find it interesting that the chapter focuses on Dunbar's number and maintaining a specific number of online relationships, when in reality, I've organically shaped my Facebook use around practical purposes - keeping up with what's happening in my kids' activities, seeing family updates, and being part of groups that match my interests and values. The platform becomes more like a community bulletin board where I can choose which posts and updates matter to me, rather than a popularity contest measured by friend counts.

It's funny - until reading this chapter, I never even thought about the "ideal" number of Facebook friends or whether that could impact mental health. My approach has always been pretty straightforward: connect with people I know and join groups that are useful or meaningful to me. Maybe that's accidentally been the healthier way to use it all along.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Week 1

Hi, everyone. I'm Stacie, and I’m excited to kick off this blog as part of our Communicating Online course.  About Me I’m currently in my third year of pursuing an Environmental Economics and Policy degree while working full-time (mostly remotely) at an environmental firm in Seattle. I grew up in Texas, spent a few years in Bandon, Oregon, and now live in Tacoma, Washington (so, the Pacific Time zone).  This is my first college-level communication course, but not my first communication course overall. I've taken several professionally, with my favorite being a Visual Communications course where we explored the art and impact of illustrating concepts in professional settings (illustrating a brainstorming session, or storymapping a strategic plan, for example).  A Fun Fact Fun fact: I collect domain names. I registered SpaceTime&Design ages ago, then forgot about it. When it popped up on my screen during this assignment, I realized how well it aligned with my values and...

Week 10

Social Semiotics: A Visual Approach to Meaning Making Social semiotics is all about understanding how visuals communicate meaning. Instead of just focusing on words, this approach looks at how images, gestures, and even the way things are arranged in a picture influence what we take away from it. The idea comes from Michael Halliday, who developed systemic functional linguistics, and was later expanded by Gunther Kress, who applied it to visual communication. In today’s media-heavy world, social semiotics helps us make sense of advertising, photography, and design, giving us a better grasp of how visuals shape our thoughts and emotions. Key Principles of Social Semiotics To break down images, social semiotics uses a few principles focusing on positioning, composition, and color choices. These elements help guide how we interpret images and visual message. 1. Vertical Positioning Top of the image: Represents ideals, aspirations, or abstract concepts. Bottom of the image: Represents real...

Week 9 - The Digital Battleground

The Digital Battleground: Social Media and Public Opinion Social media has fundamentally transformed how public opinion forms today. What once required access to traditional gatekeepers now operates in a dynamic ecosystem where influence can emerge from virtually anywhere. The democratization of voice means nearly anyone can reach millions, creating both remarkable opportunities and significant challenges. As Leftheriotis and Giannakos noted in their 2014 research, these platforms function as spaces where information exchange happens continuously without traditional controls. The speed of opinion formation has accelerated dramatically. Where public discourse once evolved over days through editorial pages, social media operates in real-time. A trending hashtag can emerge, dominate conversation, and fade within hours. What's particularly concerning is how algorithms reinforce existing beliefs. Platforms designed to maximize engagement often show users content that confirms their ...